If a lion could talk we could not understand himLudwig Wittgenstein
Also relates to Firefox and Co
I now have a Social Bookmarks page on del.icio.us. As well as sharing resources, the incentive for moving my collection of bookmarks to an online repository was this excellent little tip from Simon Willison for integrating del.icio.us with Live Bookmarks, plus the additional space that is freed up on my Personal Toolbar.
The del.icio.us extension for Firefox has just been updated for the Preview Release, but currently the link seems to be broken, so I have settled for using nutr.itio.us for the time being.
The updated extension is available now and adds additional functionality to this great tool.
Posted on Sep 18, 2004 at 02:07:56. [Comments for del.icio.us- 0]
This post does not relate to any other topics
I only stumbled on the latest pre-production Opera release yesterday by chance. While testing a site, an overflow controlled floated DIV container
was failing to scroll in Opera 7. Since I knew my version (7.11) was out of date, and working on the assumption that most dedicated Opera users update on a regular basis, I thought it
would be better to test the page in a newer version, than rework my CSS file to resolve this error. On loading the Opera download page I discovered that version 7.5 Beta has just been released on Thursday (22nd April).
This new version has received a considerable overhaul, with a completely innovative look to the user interface and several new features. All the familiar accessibility and testing tools, which had originally lured me to Opera prior to the Firebird (and now FireFox) Renaissance, are still there. But this new version is a long way removed from the early 7 releases. The remodelled interface offers:
…a fresh, light appearance, smaller buttons, and quicker access to key browsing features in the panel selector.Opera press releases, April 22, 2004
relevant text ads and related searches offered through Google. This is an intuitive business strategy to perhaps counter the lack of incentive to purchase the browser and get banner adverts removed. It benefits Opera with more adverts served and a higher potential click through rate. It benefits the user with less obtrusive adverts, adverts that may be of interest and more screen space to work with.
All in, I found it a very pleasurable experience test driving this beta release of a radically improved browser. The release is complemented by improvements in OperaMail, the web based mail client, which now allows collection of a number of POP3 mail accounts within the webmail interface.
Even so, I can't see my allegiance to Firefox altering. The vast collection of Firefox extensions now available offer all the features present in Opera and more besides. Not forgetting the ability to customise the browser with multiple identities and the ability to further extend the functionality with my own XUL. However, the off-the-shelf and fully loaded Opera could be much more appealing to the home user who does not want to get embroiled in the intricacies of installing XPI's and modifying chrome files.
The Opera forums show there is a little way to go before this becomes a production release, but the browser market is certainly hotting up! AOL is marketing version 10 to the home user here in the UK and developers eyes are turned towards the Mozilla 1.7 RC 1 and its improved functionality (including support for SVG). The Opera team have certainly laid down a credible contender.
Oh, and as for the non-scrolling DIV - it works fine!
Posted on Apr 24, 2004 at 14:08:20. [Comments for The Opera Revolution- 1]
Also relates to Firefox and Co
Had a read of Blake Ross's Marketing Firebird Article and Simon Willison's Follow Up (+ comments) last night, and decided to delve a bit deeper into Firebird and it's capabilities. I have had 0.6 installed for several months now, but my default browser has been Mozilla, since this carries the DOM Inspector, Calender and other useful development tools.
Well following a couple of hours play, a few extension installs, and a change of theme to Breeze, I can now say I am a very content user of Mozilla Firebird. I had two recoverable crashes during extension installs, but otherwise have seen no ill effects following intensive use over the last 24 hours. I have transferred my Calender file across to the Firebird profile, and the only thing lacking really is the DOM Inspector. But there is a noticeable improvement in performance and speed now. What draws me to this browser is the minimal initial install and the freedom to install the extension I actually want to use without add-ons that just eat up my resources as they gather dust. I have found the following particularly delectable:
So the big question is why does the browser get so much criticism on Downloads.com? (Sorry, I am not going to give the link, you will just have to track it down if you must!) Well personally I tend to agree with Mickey C's remarks that many of the reviews do seem too calculated. I cannot see how so many people can become so bitter about a browser in such a small space of time, with no opinions from the opposite side of the coin.
Admittedly, there are quirks. I tracked resources with Cacheman and the browser does appear to get a bit greedy, it does boot slow, and there is the autocomplete bug - a known issue partially resolved in 6.0.1, but it seems to me the features far outweigh any satisfaction I have ever received from Micro$oft Internet Exploder. It is still early days for Firebird, but this is a very tidy and well thought on piece of software. I see Firebird becoming an integral part of my day to day surfing, while I will continue to use my browser suite for development. Even as I compose, Thunderbird is downloading.
A big thumbs up!
And if you want to know what makes Firebird, read up on Why you should switch to Firebird.
Posted on Aug 04, 2003 at 23:11:48. [Comments for Firebird, A Browser For The Future- 0]
This post does not relate to any other topics
Netscape RIP. End of an era perhaps?
It has been learned through public and private sources that AOL has cut or will cut the remaining team working on Mozilla in a mass firing and are dismantling what was left of Netscape (they've even pulled the logos off the buildings). Some will remain working on Mozilla during the transition, and will move to other jobs within AOL.
[…]
4. The non-profit and independent Mozilla Foundation has been started and will control Mozilla development. Notice the new web site at www.mozilla.org 5. Mozilla is NOT dead, far from it. 6. AOL TW will donate $2 million over the next 2 years. Since the Mozilla Foundation is non-profit, companies (including AOL TW) can continue to donate money basically for free since they can use it to reduce their taxes. AOL will also continue to support Mozilla in areas such as domain names, servers, bandwidth, etc. 7. IBM and Sun, among other companies, have said they will continue to support Mozilla.
[…]
Finally… 9. MOZILLA IS NOT DEAD 10. MOZILLA IS NOT DEAD 11. MOZILLA IS NOT DEAD Summary of what has happened by Cygonea
Posted on Jul 16, 2003 at 22:52:30. [Comments for Netscape RIP- 0]
This post does not relate to any other topics
Just got around to updating my Opera browser to version 7.11 the other day, and only just discovered some nice additional features.
Opera has been my browser of choice for the last couple of years, although recently I have found myself working more with Mozilla and the DOM inspector tool. However, Opera still continues to offer some excellent instant tools for testing the accessibility of a site, such as the additional stylesheets, one click disabling of images, javascript, plugins and the like and window size testing. I have also always found Opera the best performance browser for research, when I am using multiple windows and rapidly jumping from page to page. The additional Notes tab just reinforces my sentiment towards this.
If you don't use Opera or have never tried it, why not download the software and give it a go. The only thing as a developer now is I have to remember to keep checking my sites on the rusty IE, before getting too carried away with the stylesheet capabilities offered in Opera and Mozilla. Hope the next MS operating system hosts a more compliant browser!?
Posted on Jul 14, 2003 at 18:34:09. [Comments for Useful Tools In Opera 7.11- 0]